The chemical finishes on your clothes, and what washing removes
The fiber label tells you what a garment is made of. It doesn’t tell you what was put on it afterward. Mills use around 1,900 chemical substances to make textiles, and 165 of them carry an EU hazard classification. Some wash out at the mill. A lot of the finishing chemistry is designed to stay in the fabric when you buy it.
How finishes get onto fabric
Most finishes are padded on: the fabric runs through a bath of finishing liquor and between rollers, then it’s dried and baked so the finish sets. That’s how finishing liquor is applied in more than 80% of cases, according to the EU’s technical reference for textile mills, and it notes that a final wash “tends to be avoided unless absolutely necessary.” Softeners, increasingly silicone ones, are padded or sprayed on the same way, which transfers all of the liquid onto the fabric.
| Finish | Words on the label | What it’s made of | Does washing remove it? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wrinkle-free | Non-iron, wrinkle-free, durable press, easy care | Resins built from urea, melamine, glyoxal or formaldehyde | Loose formaldehyde mostly washes out; the resin stays |
| Water-repellent | Water-repellent, DWR, weatherproof | Fluorinated polymers (PFAS), silicones or hydrocarbon waxes | It wears off slowly, and fluorinated ones shed PFAS as they go |
| Stain-resistant | Stain-resistant, stain-release, oil-repellent | Fluorinated finishes, the only kind that repels oil | Built to last |
| Odor control | Antimicrobial, anti-odor, odor control, silver | Silver, triclosan, quaternary ammonium compounds | Half or more of some agents is gone after 10 washes |
| Flame-resistant | Flame resistant (children’s sleepwear) | Durable flame retardants bonded to the fiber, or flame-resistant fiber | Required to survive 50 washes |
Wrinkle-free and no-iron
No-iron shirts are cotton cross-linked with resins made from urea, melamine, glyoxal or formaldehyde, and those resins can release formaldehyde. When the US Government Accountability Office tested 180 skin-contact items in 2010, 10 were over the strictest international limits, and more than half of those were labeled durable press. The US has no legal limit on formaldehyde in clothing, and labels don’t say whether a garment was treated with it.
Formaldehyde is classified by IARC as carcinogenic to humans. On skin the concern is allergy, though dermatologists disagree about how often modern finishes cause it. For the full picture, see whether cotton is sustainable.
Water repellents (DWR)
A durable water repellent, or DWR, is what makes rain bead on a jacket. There are four kinds: side-chain fluorinated polymers, which are PFAS, silicones, hydrocarbon waxes, and newer chemistries such as dendrimers. Fluorinated DWRs come in long-chain (C8) and short-chain (C6) versions.
Fluorinated DWR doesn’t stay put. When 13 commercial DWR garments were weathered for 300 hours to mimic their lifetime of use, the levels of some PFAS rose 5- to more than 100-fold in most of them. Washing sheds fibers carrying the fluorinated coating, and aging plus washing releases PFAS from both C6 and C8 finishes. Spray-on reproofers are another source: PFAS turned up in 60% of the impregnating sprays tested in one Swiss survey.
Fluorine isn’t needed to keep rain out. The best fluorine-free DWRs repelled water as well as short-chain fluorinated finishes in independent tests, and researchers called PFAS on everyday outdoor clothing “over-engineering.” What fluorine-free finishes can’t do is repel oil. See PFAS in clothing.
Stain resistance
Stain-resistant clothing and fabric is where the oil repellency comes in, and only fluorinated finishes provide it. In a 2022 investigation, 72% of products marketed as stain- or water-resistant contained PFAS, while none of the tested products without those claims did.
Odor control
Antimicrobial finishes are sold as odor control, mostly on sportswear and socks. The common agents are silver, triclosan and quaternary ammonium compounds. They wash out: in Swedish tests, about half or more of the triclosan and triclocarban in treated textiles was gone after ten washes, and between 1% and 45% of a fabric’s silver came out in a single wash in another study. Many don’t work anyway. Of the antibacterial garments the Swedish Chemicals Agency tested, 68% had no effect after 10 washes and 28% had none before the first.
The odor problem is mostly a synthetic one. Polyester shirts worn to a workout smelled more intense and less pleasant than cotton, and odor bacteria grew almost only on the polyester.
Flame retardants in children’s sleepwear
US children’s sleepwear from nine months to size 14 must pass a flame test, as made and after 50 washes, unless it’s tight-fitting. Snug pajamas carry a yellow hangtag that says the garment isn’t flame resistant. Flame-resistant pajamas are made from inherently flame-resistant fabric or treated with flame retardants.
The rule has a history. In 1977 the Consumer Product Safety Commission banned children’s clothing treated with the flame retardant Tris, saying it could be absorbed through the skin or by mouthing. About 18 million treated garments were on sale. Polyester, acetate and triacetate were the fabrics that most often needed it.
Should you wash new clothes before wearing them?
Yes. In a 2022 study of 120 garments for pregnant women and young children, the 20 with the most formaldehyde were washed once on a quick cold cycle, and none had a detectable level afterward. The American Academy of Dermatology advises washing a child’s new clothes to remove excess dyes and fabric finishers.
Washing has limits. In clothing tested at Stockholm University, ten washes cut benzothiazoles by about half and quinolines by only a fifth, and quinolines were found mainly in polyester. Durable finishes are designed to stay: flame resistance has to survive 50 washes, and washing a fluorinated DWR can release more PFAS rather than less.
Frequently asked questions
Should you wash new clothes before wearing them?
Yes. In a 2022 study, one quick cold wash took the 20 garments with the most formaldehyde down to undetectable levels, and the American Academy of Dermatology advises washing new clothes, especially for children with eczema. Washing won't remove durable finishes, though.
Are wrinkle-free shirts safe?
Wrinkle-free and no-iron finishes are cross-linking resins that can release formaldehyde, a known human carcinogen and skin allergen. Most tested shirts were under international limits, and the US has no limit at all. If you want to avoid it, skip no-iron finishes and wash new shirts first.
What is a DWR coating?
DWR stands for durable water repellent, a finish that makes water bead up on a jacket. It is made from one of four chemistries: side-chain fluorinated polymers (PFAS), silicones, hydrocarbon waxes, or newer alternatives such as dendrimers.
Does DWR have PFAS?
Fluorinated DWR does. Silicone and hydrocarbon DWRs don't, and the best of them repel water as well as short-chain fluorinated finishes. What they can't do is repel oil.
Do antimicrobial clothes work?
Often not for long. When the Swedish Chemicals Agency tested antibacterial sportswear and socks, 68% had no antibacterial effect after 10 washes and 28% had none even before washing.
Are children's pajamas treated with flame retardants?
US sleepwear for children over nine months up to size 14 must either pass a flame test or fit snugly. Flame-resistant pajamas are made from inherently flame-resistant fabric or treated with flame retardants, and the treatment has to last 50 washes.
Sources
- European Commission (2003), Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Textiles Industry. bureau-industrial-transformation.jrc.ec.europa.eu
- Roth J et al. (2023), Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Textiles Industry, European Commission Joint Research Centre. bureau-industrial-transformation.jrc.ec.europa.eu
- Swedish Chemicals Agency (2013), Hazardous chemicals in textiles: report of a government assignment, Report 3/13. kemi.se
- US Government Accountability Office (2010), Formaldehyde in Textiles, GAO-10-875. gao.gov
- Herrero M et al. (2022), Early-Life Exposure to Formaldehyde through Clothing, Toxics 10(7):361. doi.org
- IARC, List of classifications by cancer sites with sufficient or limited evidence in humans, IARC Monographs Volumes 1–141. monographs.iarc.who.int
- de Groot AC et al. (2010), Formaldehyde-releasers: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 2: Formaldehyde-releasers in clothes: durable press chemical finishes, Contact Dermatitis 63(1):1-9. doi.org
- Holmquist H et al. (2016), Properties, performance and associated hazards of state-of-the-art durable water repellent (DWR) chemistry for textile finishing, Environment International 91:251-264. doi.org
- Hill PJ, Taylor M, Goswami P, Blackburn RS (2017), Substitution of PFAS chemistry in outdoor apparel and the impact on repellency performance, Chemosphere 181:500-507. doi.org
- Schellenberger S et al. (2019), Highly fluorinated chemicals in functional textiles can be replaced by re-evaluating liquid repellency and end-user requirements, Journal of Cleaner Production 217:134-143. doi.org
- van der Veen I et al. (2020), The effect of weathering on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from durable water repellent (DWR) clothing, Chemosphere 249:126100. doi.org
- van der Veen I et al. (2022), Fate of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Durable Water-Repellent Clothing during Use, Environmental Science & Technology 56(9):5886-5897. doi.org
- Schellenberger S et al. (2019), Release of Side-Chain Fluorinated Polymer-Containing Microplastic Fibers from Functional Textiles During Washing and First Estimates of Perfluoroalkyl Acid Emissions, Environmental Science & Technology 53(24):14329-14338. doi.org
- Favreau P et al. (2017), Multianalyte profiling of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in liquid commercial products, Chemosphere 171:491-501. doi.org
- Toxic-Free Future (2022), Toxic Convenience: The hidden costs of forever chemicals in stain- and water-resistant products. toxicfreefuture.org
- Geranio L, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2009), The behavior of silver nanotextiles during washing, Environmental Science & Technology 43(21):8113-8118. doi.org
- Swedish Chemicals Agency (2012), Antibacterial substances leaking out with the washing water, PM 1/12. kemi.se
- Swedish Chemicals Agency (2015), Antibacterial treatment of clothes: does it really have an effect? PM 8/15. kemi.se
- Callewaert C et al. (2014), Microbial Odor Profile of Polyester and Cotton Clothes after a Fitness Session, Applied and Environmental Microbiology 80(21). journals.asm.org
- 16 CFR Part 1615, Standard for the Flammability of Children's Sleepwear: Sizes 0 Through 6X. ecfr.gov
- 16 CFR Part 1616, Standard for the Flammability of Children's Sleepwear: Sizes 7 Through 14. ecfr.gov
- US Consumer Product Safety Commission (2012), Children's Sleepwear Safety, Publication 5132. cpsc.gov
- US Consumer Product Safety Commission (1977), TRIS-Treated Children's Garments Ban. cpsc.gov
- US Consumer Product Safety Commission (1977), CPSC Answers Consumer Inquiries On TRIS. cpsc.gov
- Luongo G et al. (2016), The washout effect during laundry on benzothiazole, benzotriazole, quinoline, and their derivatives in clothing textiles, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(3):2537-2548. doi.org
- Luongo G, Thorsén G, Östman C (2014), Quinolines in clothing textiles: a source of human exposure and wastewater pollution? Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 406(12):2747-2756. doi.org
- American Academy of Dermatology, Eczema: tips to help your child feel better. aad.org
- Global Standard gGmbH (2023), Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) Version 7.0. fr.usbcertification.com